Does this sound reasonable?
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 22:23
Today I was making some roast beef sandwich meat which I hope will be a respectable clone of Arby's roast beef. Anyhow after stuffing a chub and putting it in the smokehouse I was left with a couple pounds of extra mince. Rather than wasting it I wrapped it in cellophane and placed it in a ziplock bag and stuck started to cook it sous vide so I could experiment with the texture of this luncheon meat cooked to 132F versus that cooking in the smoker to an internal temp of 155F.
This is new ground for me and I want to be safe so I looked at the pasteurization temperatures for meat but couldn't find anything much directed at the pasteurization temperature and lethality times of minced meat.
What I did find was this.
http://www.foodhandler.com/cooking-past ... fer-foods/
According to this the lethality time for a whole muscle at 133F is 55 minutes.
Then below this it says the lethality time for ground meat is 15 seconds at 155F.
If you look back at the whole muscle table it says the time is 22 seconds at 155F which is actually longer for a whole muscle than mince but essentially they are about the same.
With this in mind, does it sound reasonable that if I kept the "test mince" at 133F for 2.5 hours it should result in a safe cook? Seems to me it would but I may be missing something. I just want to compare these two cooking methods and compare the end product.
This is new ground for me and I want to be safe so I looked at the pasteurization temperatures for meat but couldn't find anything much directed at the pasteurization temperature and lethality times of minced meat.
What I did find was this.
http://www.foodhandler.com/cooking-past ... fer-foods/
According to this the lethality time for a whole muscle at 133F is 55 minutes.
Then below this it says the lethality time for ground meat is 15 seconds at 155F.
If you look back at the whole muscle table it says the time is 22 seconds at 155F which is actually longer for a whole muscle than mince but essentially they are about the same.
With this in mind, does it sound reasonable that if I kept the "test mince" at 133F for 2.5 hours it should result in a safe cook? Seems to me it would but I may be missing something. I just want to compare these two cooking methods and compare the end product.