Question on Stanley Marianski's sausage recipes
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 04:38
Hi everyone,
In Stanley's book "Home Production of Quality Meats & Sausages" he includes lots of great recipes in Chapter 13 for fresh sausage. However I'm a little confused about how to achieve the ideal fat ratio in some of the recipes (the consensus from experienced sausage makers is around 25-30%)
So take for example recipe for Merguez (p.247). It calls for 1000g lamb meat. That's it. What's the assumption here about the fat content? I can think of 3 cases:
1) use lean lamb meat only (result: 0% fat, really?!)
2) use lean lamb meat & add about 430g pork back fat (result: 30% fat)
3) use lamb meat that is 30% fat / 70% lean (result: 30% fat, but with lamb fat)
The reason I'm asking is that in other recipes, such as Bockwurst on p. 232, the back fat is listed explicitly along with the other ingredients (pork 500g, veal 300g, back fat 200g). Since Stanley sometimes does include back fat in some recipes, I wonder what to do when it's not listed?
Here are other recipes from the book that call for plain meats without any comment about the expected fat content of the meat, and no back-fat listed:
Bratwurst p. 235: pork 700g, veal 300g
Longanisa p. 245: pork 1000g
Loukanika p. 246: pork 700g, lamb 300g
etc.
The way I have been approaching them is to always use lean cuts of meat (pork, veal, lamb) as per the quantities listed in the recipe, then add extra pure back-fat to get the final product to around 25-30%. Not sure if this is what's intended by the recipe.
If Stanley or any other members could weigh in on how these recipes should be interpreted it would really help clear this up for me.
Cheers,
Nico
In Stanley's book "Home Production of Quality Meats & Sausages" he includes lots of great recipes in Chapter 13 for fresh sausage. However I'm a little confused about how to achieve the ideal fat ratio in some of the recipes (the consensus from experienced sausage makers is around 25-30%)
So take for example recipe for Merguez (p.247). It calls for 1000g lamb meat. That's it. What's the assumption here about the fat content? I can think of 3 cases:
1) use lean lamb meat only (result: 0% fat, really?!)
2) use lean lamb meat & add about 430g pork back fat (result: 30% fat)
3) use lamb meat that is 30% fat / 70% lean (result: 30% fat, but with lamb fat)
The reason I'm asking is that in other recipes, such as Bockwurst on p. 232, the back fat is listed explicitly along with the other ingredients (pork 500g, veal 300g, back fat 200g). Since Stanley sometimes does include back fat in some recipes, I wonder what to do when it's not listed?
Here are other recipes from the book that call for plain meats without any comment about the expected fat content of the meat, and no back-fat listed:
Bratwurst p. 235: pork 700g, veal 300g
Longanisa p. 245: pork 1000g
Loukanika p. 246: pork 700g, lamb 300g
etc.
The way I have been approaching them is to always use lean cuts of meat (pork, veal, lamb) as per the quantities listed in the recipe, then add extra pure back-fat to get the final product to around 25-30%. Not sure if this is what's intended by the recipe.
If Stanley or any other members could weigh in on how these recipes should be interpreted it would really help clear this up for me.
Cheers,
Nico